An article about emotional inquiry, which is a three-step way of unpacking a strong reaction. Name the feeling as precisely as you can. Work out what it threatened. Then decide what the situation actually needs from you. It's a good method. The problem is that nobody runs it in their head in the moment they'd need it.

My first instinct was a journal with three prompts, and I think that's wrong. Any single entry is close to useless. You already know you were annoyed on Tuesday. It gets interesting around thirty entries, when it turns out most of your worst reactions this quarter were about competence and most of them happened in the same meeting.

So it's a log, and that means the fields have to be structured. You can't count free text. Make the whole thing a text box and you end up with a diary nobody can summarize, including whoever wrote it.

Thirty seconds or it doesn't get used

Four taps and one optional line. Around forty emotion words to pick from, with a note to pick the closest one rather than the strongest one. Six things that might feel threatened. A slider for how bad it was. A line of context if you feel like it.

Then it makes you close it out: what does this need? Nothing, wait, find out more, or say something. Nothing goes first on the list, because most of the time that's the honest answer and an app that never offers it is teaching you the wrong thing.